US OPEN WEDNESDAY
6/17/202651 min
With Eddie battering away at his high hat, Andrew and Iain get together to give a final preview on the eve of the US Open. They discuss all the favourites and the potential difficulty of the course, while hearing from Rory McIlroy, Scottie Scheffler and Matt Fitzpatrick. They take a wander through the history of The US Open at Shinnecock Hills as well as the place itself and then all three manage to give their picks for the title, letting you know exactly which players you should avoid.
This episode is brought to you by: www.petermillar.co.uk
And also: www.ping.com
And possibly also Lemsips.
Email: tcf@thechippingforecast.co.uk
Instagram: @chippingforecast.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Clips
Transcript preview
First 90 secondsSpeaker 10:00
[beeping] It's time now for the Chipping Forecast in association with Peter Millar, brought to you by Andrew Cotter, Eddie Pepperell, and special guest Ian Carter.
Andrew Cotter· Host0:15
[upbeat music] Hello there, and welcome to Wednesday pod ahead of the U.S. Open, U.S. Open eve, and the dedication. The dedication of the TCF team i- is such that we are missing Ian Carter, regular special guest, and I are missing Portugal against the Democratic Republic of Congo for this. And I've been a big, the big supporter of DR Congo, Dr. Congo, as I call them, for a long time. My- Ever since they were Zaire? Zaire. Well, they... Did they not play Scotland in 1974?
Iain Carter· Guest0:54
They did, yeah.
Andrew Cotter· Host0:55
There was not a draw against Zaire- Yeah ... that cost Scotland in that one. I think it might have been.
Iain Carter· Guest0:58
It was, yes. Yeah, that was a group that, um, that very gilded Scottish team was expected to, to come through, wasn't it?
Andrew Cotter· Host1:05
Yeah.
Iain Carter· Guest1:05
Very disappointing.
Andrew Cotter· Host1:06
Although by that stage, Dennis Law was just a bit over the hill, but it was still a very good side. The sides that Scotland had in '74 and '78, genuinely, and people laugh when you say this, but genuinely with the players they had, they could have won the World Cup if they had, you know, had a good structure, good coaching, et cetera. Um, but, but they, they didn't. They were just a talented- The- ... but a sort of disparate bunch and- Those, those were the World Cups