Theft Example Clarifies Mens Rea
9:55–10:30 · 35s
Using a simple theft scenario, McKeown shows why proving intent is separate from proving the act, and how that distinction disappears in a facts-only trial.
9:55–10:30 · 35s
Using a simple theft scenario, McKeown shows why proving intent is separate from proving the act, and how that distinction disappears in a facts-only trial.
We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click "Accept All" to consent, or "Decline non-essential" to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.