Robin Hanson on Prediction Markets, Gambling, and the Future of Forecasting
5/26/202628 min
Theo Jaffee and Sophia Puccini speak with economist Robin Hanson about prediction markets, gambling, and why he believes speculative markets are one of the most powerful tools humans have for aggregating information and forecasting outcomes.
The conversation begins with Minnesota’s recent law criminalizing prediction markets before expanding into the broader backlash surrounding platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket. Hanson explains his long-term vision for “decision markets,” where markets could help guide choices made by companies, governments, and even individuals.
Along the way, they discuss sports betting, games and human psychology, futurism, AI, and Hanson’s broader work on how societies misunderstand risk, incentives, and coordination
Resources:
Follow Robin Hanson on X: https://x.com/robinhanson
Follow Theo Jaffee on X: https://x.com/theojaffee
Follow Sophia Puccini on X: https://x.com/schisofrenia
Stay Updated:
Find a16z on YouTube: YouTube
Find a16z on X
Find a16z on LinkedIn
Listen to the a16z Show on Spotify
Listen to the a16z Show on Apple Podcasts
Follow our host: https://twitter.com/eriktorenberg
Please note that the content here is for informational purposes only; should NOT be taken as legal, business, tax, or investment advice or be used to evaluate any investment or security; and is not directed at any investors or potential investors in any a16z fund. a16z and its affiliates may maintain investments in the companies discussed. For more details please see a16z.com/disclosures.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Clips
Transcript preview
First 90 secondsSpeaker 00:00
Well, so start at the beginning. The basic vision is that speculative markets are shown to be a unmatched mechanism for aggregating information and telling us about stuff. [chuckles] And initially, most people who come to this area think about, let's have markets on the big topics in public conversation, in the news, in politicians' speeches, in policy wonk, you know, reports. And that's what you're seeing initially here with Kalshi and PolyMarket as well. But I think most of the value is actually advising decisions for individuals and organizations, not in the big public conversation topics. We could advise business ventures like that with conditional stock markets. So for example, we could have a stock market in a company that says, "What's the price of this company if the CEO stays in power past the end of the quarter?" And another, "What happens if the CEO leaves by the end of the quarter?" Those would give you two different stock prices. The higher one would be the advice about what to do. There aren't any decisions companies make much bigger than that.
Theo Jaffee· Host1:00
For decades, Robin Hanson has argued that prediction markets are one of the most effective tools humans have for aggregating information and forecasting outcomes, not just for elections or sports betting, but for helping companies, governments, and individuals make better decisions. That vision is becoming more relevant as platforms like PolyMarket and Kalshi bring prediction markets into mainstream culture. But it's also triggering backlash, including