Particle Data Platform

Overtime – Episode #728: Gillian Tett & Bret Stephens

5/5/202615 min

Bill Maher and his guests answer viewer questions after the show. (Originally aired 5/1/26

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Clips

Transcript preview

First 90 seconds
  1. Speaker 00:00

    [upbeat music] Welcome to an HBO podcast from the HBO Late Night series, Real Time with Bill Maher.

  2. Bill Maher· Host0:06

    [clapping] All right, he's a Pulitzer Prize-winning opinion columnist for The New York Times, Bret Stephens. [cheering] [clapping] And she's the head of King's College, Cambridge, my old job- [laughs] ... and a Financial Times act- columnist, Gillian Tett. Okay. [cheering] [clapping] All right. Bret, this is for you. How can Trump wrap up the Iran war and claim success? Oh, what a question.

  3. Bret Stephens· Guest0:27

    Um, I think the blockade is a good idea. Uh, I think, uh, if the Iranians don't come to terms... By the way, I think they'll be under a great deal of economic pressure very soon as their, uh, inability to fund themselves becomes, becomes more, uh, uh, severe. I think he may have to stage operations to seize the enriched uranium. It's difficult, but doable. That was the purpose of this mission. Stopping Iran from getting a nuclear bomb is a very worthy objective.

  4. Bill Maher· Host0:58

    Yeah.

  5. Bret Stephens· Guest0:58

    And if then that leads- [clapping] ... not now or even in six months, but in a year's time, that pressure leads to the end of this terrible regime, the world will be much better off, uh, for it. So, I, right now the war feels like- [clapping] ... stopping World War II in, in 1943. You can say, "Well, it's a failure," but we should continue because the objective of preventing this uniquely evil regime from getting these uniquely devastating weapons is a good objective for the United States.

  6. Bill Maher· Host1:24

    But you don't wanna go back to bombing the country, do you?

  7. Bret Stephens· Guest1:26

    I would... No, only to the, for, for the sake

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click "Accept All" to consent, or "Decline non-essential" to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.