Particle Data Platform

Mandy Lifeboats

2/10/202644 min

The latest break in Peter Mandelson’s CV, the other secrets hiding in the Epstein files, and what comes next for the British government. With Ian Hislop, Helen Lewis, Adam MacQueen and Andrew Hunter Murray.

Clips

Transcript preview

First 90 seconds
  1. Speaker 10:00

    [upbeat music] Discover top-rated stays loved by guests. Rated highest by real guests through authentic reviews. Vrbo, book a vacation rental loved by guests.

  2. Speaker 20:13

    [upbeat music] When you manage procurement for multiple facilities, every order matters. But when it's for a hospital system, they matter even more. Granger gets it and knows there's no time for managing multiple suppliers and no room for shipping delays. That's why Granger offers millions of products and fast, dependable delivery, so you can keep your facility stocked, safe, and running smoothly. Call one eight hundred Granger, click granger.com, or just stop by. Granger, for the ones who get it done.

  3. Helen Lewis· Panelist0:43

    [typewriter typing] Page 94, the Private Eye Podcast.

  4. Andrew Hunter Murray· Host0:48

    Hello, and welcome to another episode of Page 94. My name's Andrew Hunter Murray, and I'm here in the Eye Studio with Helen Lewis, Adam McQueen, and Ian Hislop. We are here on quite a fast-moving news day. [laughs] So [laughs] this is just to say that at the time of recording, Keir Starmer's Prime Minister and Peter Mandelson hasn't been brought back in again- [laughs] ... for another job. I've come up with a new principle, uh, of, of political life. You know the thing of the Peter principle?

  5. Helen Lewis· Panelist1:16

    Mm.

  6. Andrew Hunter Murray· Host1:17

    [laughs] Where everyone is employed one degree more than they should be? This is the Peter Mandelson principle, where you come back one time after you really should be.

  7. Helen Lewis· Panelist1:24

    One time too many.

  8. Andrew Hunter Murray· Host1:26

    One time too many. Yeah.

  9. Ian Hislop· Panelist1:27

    I would say three is three times too many.

  10. Unknown speaker1:29

    [laughs]

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click "Accept All" to consent, or "Decline non-essential" to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.