How to Think About the Future (Part 2): Four Variables Shaping the Coming Decades | Frankly 139
4/24/202633 min
This week's Frankly is part two of the series How to Think About the Future. Today, Nate expands on the case for holding a distribution of possible futures rather than a single preferred one, and walks through a structured scenario-building exercise. He begins with the two-by-two grid that he has used for years, which indicates whether the economy will expand or contract and whether this happens within ecological limits or in overshoot. The four quadrants this produces represent possible directions toward the future: toward green growth, Mordor, Mad Max, or the Great Simplification.
From there, Nate layers three more grids on top of this economic foundation. A grid focused on power – military, political, financial, and technological – asks how concentrated each is and where the gains flow. A grid regarding geopolitics maps cooperation and adversarial relations against interdependence and self-sufficiency, using the Strait of Hormuz closure as a live example of an adversarial and interdependent geopolitical makeup. Finally, an Earth systems grid tracks climate stress and biosphere integrity, taking into account that we are operating from an already compromised baseline. Nate also describes the role of technology as a modifier across all these grids, which amplifies whatever direction the surrounding system is already moving. He emphasizes that the real future will always come as a composite across these layers, and that the same economic headline produces radically different lived realities depending on the power, geopolitical, and ecological conditions it sits inside.
Where do you find yourself already settled on a particular view of the future, and what gets filtered out when you are? Of the four grids Nate lays out, which feels most defining in your thinking, and which do you tend to underweight? What other grids might matter for anticipating the future, and how might they interact with the ones here?
(Recorded April 20th, 2026)
Watch this video episode on YouTube
Want to learn the broad overview of The Great Simplification in 30 minutes? Watch our Animated Movie.
---
Support The Institute for the Study of Energy and Our Future
Transcript preview
First 90 secondsNate Hagens· Host0:00
Good morning. This is part two of how to think about the future series, where we're gonna take a deeper dive into scenario building and ultimately using that for planning and doing. Uh, in part one, I talked about why I think it's important to hold the future as, uh, sort of a landscape of possibilities, not the futures we want or prefer, but those that are possible starting there. And I shared the trap I often see people fall into, uh, when we get settled on our particular view of the future and then start framing and judging everything else against it. In contrast, I and, and many other system scientists that I've, uh, known or studied find it most helpful to have a distribution of possible futures that I consider with kind of a midpoint. And the reality is, I don't know which one specifically is coming. None of us do. So the more honest and ultimately helpful move is to learn how to hold several scenarios at once, if only to have, uh, uh, overlap with discussion, uh, with people that you're striving towards making change with. So today I wanna lay out the building blocks for how to do that.
Unknown speaker1:22
[upbeat music]