Did the speech land?
17:13–18:27 · 74s
Balls says the address felt like a reheated greatest-hits package, ducked hard questions, and failed to acknowledge mistakes—so it was never likely to save Starmer.
17:13–18:27 · 74s
Balls says the address felt like a reheated greatest-hits package, ducked hard questions, and failed to acknowledge mistakes—so it was never likely to save Starmer.
We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click "Accept All" to consent, or "Decline non-essential" to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.