Enforcing International Law in U.S. Courts
6/24/20261 hr 10 min
Sarah Isgur and David French explain the various legal complications of the Iran MOU and react to the most recent opinions handed down by the Supreme Court.
The Agenda:
—Suing state employees personally
—International law in U.S. courts
—Seizing homes over unpaid taxes
—The rights of green card holders
Show notes:
—Jack Goldsmith at Executive Functions
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Clips
Transcript preview
First 90 secondsSpeaker 10:00
[upbeat music] This episode is brought to you by Starbucks. That is fire.
Sarah Isgur· Host0:04
Whoa, that's good.
David French· Host0:06
This might be the drink of the summer.
Speaker 10:07
Okay, I like this one too. I'm rocking with it. Okay. Try it for yourself. Starbucks Refreshers Concentrates are coming home. Find them in the coffee aisle and make it yours.
Speaker 40:16
You ready?
David French· Host0:19
I was born ready.
Sarah Isgur· Host0:22
[upbeat music] Welcome to Advisory Opinions. I'm Sarah Isgur. That's David French. We got five cases from the Supreme Court on Tuesday morning, and we're gonna start by not talking about them. [laughs] We will start with the war in Iran, and the legality, and the separation of powers, and Congress, and all of that. But don't worry, we are gonna get to all five cases. Landor came down. That's our religious liberty case, or actually, it's not about religious liberty at all. And then we've got three cases that are all 6-3 about causes of action and clear statement rules, but they don't all come out the same way, and you're all gonna tune out, but I'm telling you, it's actually kind of interesting when we get to take out the culture war and just see the pure, unadulterated statutory interpretation questions. So come on, stick around. Try to, try to hang