Tone Policing The Dissent
9:07–10:02 · 55s
David objects to Justice Jackson’s phrasing as attributing motives, while Sarah defends the dissent’s tone as within norms—an engaging micro-debate on judicial rhetoric.
9:07–10:02 · 55s
David objects to Justice Jackson’s phrasing as attributing motives, while Sarah defends the dissent’s tone as within norms—an engaging micro-debate on judicial rhetoric.
We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click "Accept All" to consent, or "Decline non-essential" to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.