Jim #1 Without Evidence
26:34–27:14 · 40s
The hosts admit they’ve ranked Jim Walmsley first despite having zero recent data, poking holes in their own methodology and leaning solely on his history of winning.
26:34–27:14 · 40s
The hosts admit they’ve ranked Jim Walmsley first despite having zero recent data, poking holes in their own methodology and leaning solely on his history of winning.
We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click "Accept All" to consent, or "Decline non-essential" to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.